Explain why a given set with defined addition and scalar multiplication does satisfy a given vector space property, but nonetheless isnβt a vector space.
There exists some \(\left[\begin{array}{c}\unknown\\\unknown\end{array}\right]\) where \(\left[\begin{array}{c}x_1\\x_2\end{array}\right]
+\left[\begin{array}{c}\unknown\\\unknown\end{array}\right]
=\left[\begin{array}{c}x_1\\x_2\end{array}\right]\text{.}\)
There exists some \(\left[\begin{array}{c}\unknown\\\unknown\end{array}\right]\) where \(\left[\begin{array}{c}x_1\\x_2\end{array}\right]+
\left[\begin{array}{c}\unknown\\\unknown\end{array}\right]=
\left[\begin{array}{c}0\\0\end{array}\right]\text{.}\)
\(\displaystyle\frac{1}{2}\left(\left[\begin{array}{c}x_1\\x_2\end{array}\right] +
\left[\begin{array}{c}y_1\\y_2\end{array}\right] \right)\) is the only vector whose endpoint is equally distant from the endpoints of \(\left[\begin{array}{c}x_1\\x_2\end{array}\right]\) and \(\left[\begin{array}{c}y_1\\y_2\end{array}\right]\text{.}\)
There exists some \(\unknown\) such that \(\unknown\left[\begin{array}{c}x_1\\x_2\end{array}\right]=
\left[\begin{array}{c}y_1\\y_2\end{array}\right]\text{.}\)
Every Euclidean vector space \(\mathbb R^n\) satisfies the following properties, where \(\vec u,\vec v,\vec w\) are Euclidean vectors and \(a,b\) are scalars.
Vector addition is associative: \(\vec u + (\vec v + \vec w)=
(\vec u + \vec v) + \vec w\text{.}\)
A vector space \(V\) is any set of mathematical objects, called vectors, and a set of numbers, called scalars, with associated addition \(\oplus\) and scalar multiplication \(\odot\) operations that satisfy the following properties. Let \(\vec u,\vec v,\vec w\) be vectors belonging to \(V\text{,}\) and let \(a,b\) be scalars.
Consider the set \(\IC\) of complex numbers with the usual definition for addition: \((a+b\mathbf i)\oplus(c+d\mathbf i)=(a+c)+(b+d)\mathbf i\text{.}\)
This proves that complex addition is associative: \(\vec u\oplus(\vec v \oplus \vec w) = (\vec u\oplus\vec v) \oplus \vec w\text{.}\) The seven other vector space properties may also be verified, so \(\IC\) is an example of a vector space.
Let \(\vec u, \vec v\) be in \(V\) with \(\vec u=(1, 2)\) and \(\vec v=(2, 4)\text{.}\) Using the operations defined for \(V\text{,}\) which of the following is \(\vec u\oplus\vec v\text{?}\)
Show that \(V\) does not have an additive identity element \(\vec z=(z,w)\) by showing that \((0,-1)\oplus(z,w)\not=(0,-1)\) no matter what the values of \(z,w\) are.
What are some objects that are important to you personally, academically, or otherwise that appear vector-like to you? What makes them feel vector-like? Which axiom for vector spaces does not hold for these objects, if any?
Our vector space axioms have eight properties. While these eight properties are enough to capture vectors, the objects that we study in the real world often have additional structures not captured by these axioms. What are some structures that you have encountered in other classes, or in previous experiences, that are not captured by these eight axioms?
Show that \(\mathbb{R}^+\text{,}\) the set of positive real numbers, is a vector space, but where \(x\oplus y\) really means the product (so \(2 \oplus 3 = 6\)), and where scalar multiplication \(\alpha\odot x\) really means \(x^\alpha\text{.}\) Yes, you really do need to check all of the properties, but this is the only time Iβll make you do so. Remember, examples arenβt proofs, so you should start with arbitrary elements of \(\mathbb R^+\) for your vectors. Make sure youβre careful about telling the reader what \(\alpha\) means.
Prove that additive inverses are unique. Assume you have a vector space \(V\) and some \(\vec{v} \in V\text{.}\) Further, assume \(\vec{w_1},\vec{w_2} \in V\) with \(\vec{v} \oplus \vec{w_1} = \vec{v} \oplus \vec{w_2} = \vec{z}\text{.}\) Prove that \(\vec{w_1} = \vec{w_2}\text{.}\)
Consider the vector space of polynomials, \(\P_n\text{.}\) Suppose further that \(n= ab\text{,}\) where \(a \mbox{ and } b\) are each positive integers. Conjecture a relationship between \(M_{a,b}\) and \(\P_n\text{.}\) We will investigate this further in section SectionΒ 3.6